Branch Receivables Manager

Branch Receivable Manager - X Home Branch Receivables Manager Weightage 100 % SNO. OBJECTIVE WEIGHTAGE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Annexure 1 Timely follow-up of non-delinquent cases & resolution X Bucket Efficiency 20% As per annexure 1 2 Resolution in potential fresh NPA 20% As per annexure 2 3 Resolution In Fresh NPA 20% As per annexure 3 4 Opening NPA resolutions 10% As per annexure 4 5 Overall OD 10% As per annexure 5 5 Over Due Charges Collection 10% As per annexure 6 6 Training Mandays 5% As per annexure 7 7 Process Orientation 5% As per annexure 8 Annexure - 1 - Bucket Efficiency (• Last 12 months average or last 3 months average, whichever is higher) Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) X Bucket - Efficiency (Average) >97% 95.1 - 97.0% 94.1 - 95.0% 92.1 - 94.0% Annexure - 2 - Potential Fresh NPA resolution % (12 month average or last 3 months average whichever is lower) Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) Potential Fresh NPAResolution % in POS 85% - 90% 80%-85% 75%-80% >75.0% Annexure - 3- Fresh NPA Resolution % (12 month average or last 3 months average whichever is lower) Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) Fresh NPA Resolution % in POS 80%- 85% 75% - 80% 70%- 75% >70% Annexure - 4 Opening NPA resolution including repo Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) %NPA resolution 15%-20% 10%-15% 5%-10% >5% Annexure - 5 Overall OD - based on Exit figures Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) % of Achievement Less than 15% 15%- 20% 20%-25% 25%-30% >30% Annexure - 6 Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) Overdue Charges >120% 100%-120% 90% - 100% 80% - 90% Annexure - 7 Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) Average Mandays of Training per Team Member >=3 2.5-2.99 2-2.49 1-1.99 Annexure-8 Scoring method 5 (Outstanding) 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Adequate) Audit Score >95% 91 - 95% 81-90% 71-80%